"You're not from around here, Greene," Sheriff McClellan said. "This area was one of the hardest hit ten years ago. Remember? The dead had to be burned or decapitated. The brain had to be destroyed. I don't know if those creatures were really dead or not -- not in the usual sense. Nobody knows. But somebody's afraid it's going to happen again."
Greene blanched. "It can't happen again..."
Back in 1967 Image 10 Productions, a motley band of weekend filmmakers, cobbled together the no-budget classic of all time -- not to mention one of the greatest horror films ever made, which came to be known as Night of the Living Dead (1968).
Soon after, however, fueled by a seedy distributor and a copyright snafu that reduced their profit shares significantly, the company splintered apart for reasons that would take way too long to get into here; but an amicable agreement was reached on their seminal film as they branched out in different directions: director George Romero was allowed to use the word “Dead” in future films, while producer / scriptwriter John Russo laid claim to the phrase “Living Dead” for any of his ensuing projects.
And while Romero would go on to write and direct the classic sequel Dawn of the Dead (1978), followed by the not quite as classic Day of the Dead (1985), and the long gestating but ultimately disappointing Land of the Dead (2005 -- everything after that I pretend didn’t happen), Russo hammered out a sequel of his own titled Return of the Living Dead for his New America Films Inc.
Russo’s film almost made it to screen twice; first when he managed to get Tobe Hooper -- fresh off The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (1974) -- on board to direct. A small time distributor out of Chicago by the name of Bill Link was interested and optioned the script, hoping to raise enough cash to get cameras rolling. But the money never materialized.
Then around 1976, Russo found another lifeline because he knew somebody who knew somebody high-up in the orbit of Frank Sinatra, of all people, who began negotiations with the crooner to invest some $3 million into the proposed production.
John A. Russo.
“Along with my attorney, my wife and I were brought to Las Vegas to meet with Mr. Sinatra and to attend the opening night show and party,” said Russo in the forward for Fathom Press’s 2024 edition of Return of the Living Dead. “Everything was going great, but that very night a plane carrying Mr. Sinatra’s mother to the [same] opening night festivities went down in the mountains and she and others were killed.” Understandably, the tragedy officially scuttled the Sinatra camp’s interest and, “Our potential movie did not get made.”
A few years later, Russo and company officially waved the white flag when producer Tom Fox offered them a large sum of money for the rights to the proposed film, bought them out, and turned it over to Dan O’Bannon for further development.
Knowing full well that he couldn’t compete with the social commentary of Romero’s zombie films, O’Bannon -- best known for his collaboration on Dark Star (1974) with John Carpenter, and scripting Alien (1979) -- basically junked Russo’s script, which was indeed a direct sequel to Night of the Living Dead that seemed content to just rehash its source material.
Thus, Return of the Living Dead (1985) went through a massive overhaul; and in the end it became more of a black comedy that still managed to scare the bageezus out of you as the undead chant of "Brains!" rightfully joined the pop-culture lexicon. “Its path to success took 13 years of twists and turns and valiant but frustrating struggles,” noted Russo.
Now. While O’Bannon’s film became something completely different, one can still read Russo’s original treatment. You see, Russo converted the unused script -- co-plotted with fellow former Image 10 collaborators Russell Streiner and Rudy Ricci -- into a novel, hoping to drum up some interest in financing a film version.
Russo already had one book published, the novelization of Night of the Living Dead (1974). His second was first published in 1978 by Dale Books, and Russo's tale of terror opens in rural Pennsylvania at the funeral of a young girl. After finishing the ceremony, the preacher then nods to the girl’s father, who then solemnly takes up a hammer and spike and drives it into the deceased’s skull.
When word comes that a bus has crashed close by, killing everyone on board, fearful that the dead will rise again -- like they did ten years before -- the congregation manages to spike most of the victims in the head, too, but the authorities arrive before they can finish the job.
Soon enough, the dead do rise and start rampaging and feeding again on the living. Again, no definitive explanation is given, it’s just happening again. And while the carnage progresses exponentially, the narrative keeps its focus on the Miller sisters -- Sue Ellen, Ann, and Karen (-- who is critically pregnant), a group of four sadistic looters who invade the Miller home, and two state patrolmen, Dave Benton and Carl Martinelli.
And so, as the night wears on, the protagonists must fend off both the flesh-eating ghouls and the equally dangerous thieves. Who will survive this second night of the living dead? Needless to say, come the dawn, not everyone makes it.
Return of the Living Dead the novel has a great beginning, where Russo establishes a creepy and bucolic atmosphere that just drips with tension and anxiety but, unfortunately, quickly loses all momentum once the dead rise. Any novelty the narrative had is then quickly abandoned to rehash the hole-up and siege motif of Night of the Living Dead.
Here, the zombies are just a nuisance, almost an afterthought, as the main conflict is between the looters and the cops, who are fighting over the Miller sisters. And Russo seems a little preoccupied with getting those sisters naked -- alive or dead:
"The ghoul knelt over the unconscious girl, its dead lips drooling spittle. With a glint of lust in its eyes, it bit into the soft flesh of her neck and lingered there. Then its rough hands moved down, and pulled her blouse off her body in one brutal motion. The ghoul bent its head and sunk its teeth into the girl's firm breasts, chewing bits out of one and then the other. All the while groans came from deep within its throat and the ghoul's body moved rhythmically ... more determined than before, it ripped off the rest of her clothing and relished in the soft pulpiness of her thigh and groin until it had chewed its fill."
See what I mean? Still, Russo does have a gift for describing zombie carnage. There's just not enough of it.
The book does recover in spots when it’s being original, and contains several truly macabre scenes of the looters baiting the ghouls with restrained hostages so they can get away. It also has an ambiguous ending concerning Karen’s newborn baby that will either anger you or send chills down your spine.
But the biggest obstacle the book has was how it's hamstrung by the notoriety of its source film. Sure, characters abruptly die with little or no warning; but these deaths lack any real shock value because you’re expecting it. We know this drill by heart:
No one’s safe and any one can die at any moment. And all plans -- no matter how sound -- are doomed to failure as dire situations exponentially get worse and spiral out of control. With each turn of the page you anticipate the ironic twist -- like the proverbial other shoe, waiting to drop on your head like a twenty-ton anvil.
Case in point: When Sheriff Conan “Yeah they’re dead, they’re all messed up” McClellan and his posse make a return appearance, we wait, patiently, to see who they accidentally kill this time -- and aren't disappointed.
John Russo will tell anyone who will listen that he’s just a nice guy who likes to scare people. And to those ends, over the years he did manage to actually get some 19 films produced, like Midnight (1982) and The Majorettes (1986). He also wrote some 30 novels or novelizations and several non-fiction books on independent filmmaking -- I highly recommend Scare Tactics (1992). And while film evidence shows that Russo needed Romero a lot more than Romero ever needed him, I still contend Romero’s post Image 10 work was always missing a certain somethin’ somethin’, a strange alchemy, that’s hard to define but it is clearly not there -- to me at least.
For the longest time tracking down a copy of Russo’s Return of the Living Dead wasn’t easy, and would cost you an arm and a leg when you did. It took me nearly a decade after learning of its existence to finally secure one through eBay that wasn’t THAT expensive (-- and we’ll find out why in a sec).
And you had to be really careful, too, you see, because Russo also did the novelization for O’Bannon’s film. And since they had the exact same name, that caused even more confusion and consternation -- and don’t get burnt and purchase the film adaptation by mistake, like I did, for way too much money by an unscrupulous eBay seller who insisted it was an original.
And to add insult to injury, the authentic Dale copy of Return of the Living Dead that I did get a hold of later was missing a good chunk of pages and was completely out of order in what I could only presume was some kind of printing error. As presented, the story went as follows: pages 1-24, then skip to page 89-120, and then back to page 57, which then ran to the end unbroken to page 147. By my math, that’s 33 total pages missing, with another 31 duplicated pages in that non-linear mess.
Unfortunately, those 33 missing pages contained the integral parts where the dead first come back to life again. And unfortunately, I couldn’t get this one refunded because I missed the fine print in the listing that pointed out the defect, too excited by the price as I tripped over myself on the way to the checkout page. C'est la vive.
Over the years since, Russo's novel has gone through three different printings but it’s still very rare. The original price was a mere $1.99 but expect to pay anywhere from $75 to $350 for an original copy today, depending on the seller. Is it worth that kind of money? Well, that all really depends on how big a Living Dead fan you are.
Luckily, Fathom Press got another printing of the book out in 2024, which will only set you back about $16. It was nice to finally get the full story -- flawed though it may be. But not fatally by any stretch.
Thus, Return of the Living Dead is not the greatest piece of literature you’ll ever read, but no Living Dead completest should be without it -- especially at that lower price. To me, the book just seems rushed and slapped together, where parts of it are fleshed out while others are dangerously anemic. And it gets really repetitive as Russo bangs the drum for the same plot beats over and over again, beating the reader over the head with the same thing they read, like, three pages before.
Thus, the book reads just like it should -- another draft of an unused movie script. But I should note on this latest read-through it all came off a lot better when the reader wasn't fuming over missing a third of the story. And, damn, but if it isn’t a page turner.
The sad thing is, there honestly seems to be a truly fascinating story here trying to get out if Russo could just get out of his own way. With a little nurturing it might have been a riveting film but, as it is, it falls into that dangerously nebulous gray area of being not great but also not terrible, making it ultimately and unreasonably unremarkable given its circumstances.
Originally published on November 11, 2000, at 3B Theater.

































.jpg)





















